The rebased estimates indicate that the nominal GDP for Nigeria was much higher than previously estimated . In 2010 the estimate was $360. 644 billion; in 2011 it was $408.805 billion; and 2012 $453.966 billion.
The growth rate is driven by the services sector with it contributing about 51 per cent of the GDP.
The rebasing exercise on the Nigerian economy which also saw the Per capita rising to $2, 688, covered 2010 to 2013. Nigeria has moved on the per capita scale from 135 to 121st position.
This is after more than two decades of the last exercise in 1990, far beyond the United Nations Statistical Commission, UNSC, recommendations that countries should rebase their national accounts (GDP) estimates every five years.
Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala said that the results had been subjected to a six-man independent panel of reviewers led by Prof. Olu Ajakaiye , as well as, representatives of multilateral organizations, especially the International Monetary Fund, the World bank and the African Development bank.
According to her the policy implications of the new figures were that the nation has a larger capacity for consumption and thus make Nigeria more attractive to international and local investors.
She admitted however, that the government needed to build social safety nets to close the income inequality gap in the country saying, “inequality has been rising so we need to build social safety nets meant to take care of those at the bottom of the ladder”.
The minister added however, that the oil and gas sector also needed federal government attention, as according to her, a sector with over 15 per cent contribution to the GDP cannot be ignored.
Dr. Okonjo-Iweala also said that the sudden leap of the large contribution of the services posed a challenge for the government to take more measures for a stronger manufacturing sector, in conjunction with the organized private sector.
The new figures indicated a debt to GDP of 11 per cent, down from 19 per cent but the minister said that the federal government would continue to be prudent in its debt portfolio to avoid a situation in which the country could fall into a non-sustainable debt trap, as was the case, in the past.
In his presentation, the S-G said that the past GDP estimates were less than the real position of the economy and that there was need to take another look at the nation’s poverty rate.
The S-G said however, that “GDP is a macroeconomic aggregate that depicts the totality of economic output within a nation’s borders. While it depicts how rich a nation is, this is not necessarily the same as showing how rich the individuals in the nation are, due to the problem of unequal distribution of wealth.
On methodology, Dr. Kale disclosed that preparatory work for the rebasing exercise commenced in the last quarter of 2011.
He said several activities were undertaken, some of which include the on-going development of a Supply & Use Matrix, field surveys for certain economic activities which were not adequately captured previously, validation with sector experts as well as the international development partners.
S-G added that three major methodological pillars were used to compile the rebased GDP estimates: the System of National Accounts (SNA 2008 version), the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC Revision 4); and the Central Product Classification (CPC version 2).
Wholesale and retail trade was the economic activity with the most notable changes between the old and new GDP series. This is attributable to the effort made by the NBS during the rebasing exercise to capture more of the informal sector. Telecommunications and information services; motion pictures and sound recording; cement production; food, beverage and tobacco; construction and real estate sectors also witnessed significant changes.
Members of the House of Representatives who reacted to the newly published Nigeria’s nominal Gross Domestic Product, GDP, which now stands at $509.9 billion, described it as a positive development in the right direction
According to the lawmakers, since it is quite sometime that such an estimate was made public it will create some doubts in the minds of Nigerians but that not withstanding, it is a welcome development.
Chairman House Committee on Appropriation, Rep John Enoh, PDP, Cross River, an economist had this to say,”I know that since it has been a long time such statistics were published, it may create some doubts in the minds of Nigerians but all the same it is a welcome development”.
Also speaking in the same vein, Rep Tajudeen Yusuf, PDP, Kogi, an economist described it as a welcome development worth cheering but insisted that “our poor infrastructural facilities may weigh it down”.
Jobless graduates: development is on paper
Nigerian graduates, Walter Takim and Odunayo Ayansina, who are still looking for jobs said the government should be ashamed for it to have published such statistics in spite of the current situation of the country’s economy which has remained in the downward trend.
They argued that Nigeria could not even be rated the best in the West Africa sub-region.
Walter Takim in his reaction said; “In fact, as I speak with you Nigeria is not among the best countries in the West African sub region, even in the standard of West Africa as far as am concerned is not operating the best economy so far, in fact when we are dealing with the world economy Nigeria’s name should not even be mentioned in the first place, we are still struggling to come out of this developing system.
“As an underdeveloping country we should not say anything about our economy, we should be struggling to get out of poverty.
“There is still circle of poverty that is permeating our system, what are we talking about economy when youths cannot get job. I am not happy with the country.
Odunayo Job, another graduate noted that; “It is not getting better for me, when we have about 69 percent living on less that N6000 monthly.